It’s been awhile, I spent most of August on vacation, travelling through a few cities. I had a lot of really cool conversations with friends active on campaigns based in electoral politics, community issues, and–of course–unionizing graduate workers. It’s only encouraged me to continue keeping track of what’s happening within higher education.
Here are some stories that have been happening in the past month: The gubernatorial race in New York features Cynthia Nixon as the progressive challenger against the Cuomo dynasty. Andrew Cuomo has been running hard on the Excelsior program. Started in 2016, Excelsior was supposedly Cuomo’s proposal to make public higher education free to students. Unfortunately, the number of requirements to qualify for such a scholarship make them unicorns on most campuses. A recent report concludes only 3.2% of students benefited from the program in 2017-2018. Over two-thirds of undergraduates were rejected for not making sufficient progress on their degrees. Much like every other aspect of Cuomo’s campaign, he is only interested in appearing progressive, while securing power for himself. Nixon, on the other hand, is running on an expansion of Excelsior with minimal requirements, hoping to open the program to seven times as many students.
(If you live in Brooklyn’s 18th district, Julia Salazar’s state senate campaign also calls for free tuition throughout the CUNY and SUNY systems. She’d have my vote.)
In mid-August, Goucher joined the increading list of schools to cut back on majors and departments considered not in-demand on the basis of course subscriptions. Called “Academic Revitalization,” Goucher’s Provost insisted that this was a consequence of the university’s decision to freeze tuition, linking the loss of tuition to the need to lower costs. This is despite the ratio of their endowment to current student body being $153,000 (400 million to about 2600 students). Nevertheless, this will become an increasingly popular tactic: to connect the loss of tuition revenue through concern with making college affordable to reductions in educational capacity for departments that cannot find undergraduate majors, especially as we reach the limits of tuition. Imagine making bolder arguments for an education that goes beyond a liberal conception of buying and paying for services.
Since June, many academics have been following the case between Avital Ronnell, professor of philosophy and German Studies at New York University and Nimrod Reitman, formerly a graduate student who had studied with her. It was announced last week that Ronnell would be suspended after being found guilty of sexually harassing Reitman. There are several things that intrigue these academics about this case: chief among them seems to be the fact that a woman faculty member was found guilty of harassing a male student and that seemingly every progressive humanities academic has fallen in line supporting the faculty member.
More interesting to me is the fact that these correspondences–and Reitman said he was forced to mirror Ronnell’s language–betray an aspect of academia that has deeply bothered me. Because the “life of the mind” is painted as something that seizes your labor, your life, and your soul, it is often seen as perfectly normal to envision your advisors, your faculty members, and your peers as a family with whom you would exchange affection. Some portions of these affects include eroticism, as defended by Marta Figlerowicz & Ayesha Ramachandran in a Boston Review essay some months ago. If you’ve organized graduate workers, you’ve likely struggled against this ecology of affect and labor in presenting a vision of academia as a workplace like any other.
The professors who’ve signed a letter of support for Ronnell might know something we don’t; grads and faculty across the country in specific departments and fields often have better sense of the characters at hand than even the people down the hall. But they’ve yet to produce anything coherent beyond “Ronnell is eccentric and brilliant.” More likely, they view the relationship between Ronnell and Reitman as something that happens from time to time in academia, and have determined that, while not ideal, it is not worth filing suit over. That is exactly why graduate workers, postdocs, and part-time faculty need unions to protect themselves, collectively.
Silent Sam is down. Check out the Workers Union at UNC (Twitter and Facebook) for links and feeds about this statue and the brave protestors and organizers who toppled this statue to the Confederacy. Also, donate to Durham’s bond fund, which is being used to bail out protestors on the front lines.




